At Kenworth Australia, we know every road tells a story, and we are proud to be a part of the stories that shape our communities and industries. We understand the challenges faced by those who rely on us, and we deliver solutions that contribute to their successes, one of which is advanced connectivity through telematics.
PACCAR Connect technology is standard on most Australian Made Kenworth trucks. It offers enhanced operational efficiency by monitoring vehicle performance, fuel consumption and remote diagnostics to help maximise vehicle up-time.
Visit PACCAR Connect - PACCAR AUSTRALIA to find out more.
Executive Director Update
Welcome to this week's news
Fuel Tax Credits, Renewable Diesel and the Reality Check We Can’t Ignore
Over the past six months, there has been growing momentum in policy circles to describe Fuel Tax Credits (FTCs) as a “fossil fuel subsidy” that should be phased out as part of Australia’s emissions reduction effort.
On the surface, that language sounds simple to anyone not operating a truck.
But as we all know, this risks getting the freight decarbonisation discussion horribly wrong.
ALRTA has been working on this issue well before it became public commentary, because for livestock and rural transport operators, the consequences would be immediate, material, and difficult to unwind.
The core principle remains clear: There can be no structural change to costs or taxation until reliable, affordable alternatives actually exist.
Fuel Tax Credits are not a subsidy. They are a realignment of the road user charge.
Heavy vehicles pay for road use through fuel excise and the Road User Charge. At present:
This credit corrects fuel excise collected beyond the road user charge. It is not a free pass for the industry.
Removing FTCs would not “level the playing field”.
It would impose a new cost equivalent to a carbon price of approximately $70–71 per tonne of CO₂, almost double Australia’s former carbon price.
That cost would flow directly into freight rates, food prices, and national supply chains.
A key assumption behind calls to remove Fuel Tax Credits is that alternative fuels will be ready to step in.
They are not.
ALRTA has examined the available data on renewable diesel (HVO), and the numbers are sobering:
To put the scale challenge into perspective, supplying just 10% of Australia’s diesel demand from canola-based renewable diesel would require around 7 million tonnes of canola seed. That equates to more than 4 million hectares of cropping land, greater than Victoria’s entire cropping area.
That land simply does not exist without displacing food production or exports.
Even with current government investment, the most realistic outcome is only 5–10% renewable diesel penetration by 2035.
That is progress, but it is nowhere near a full transition for heavy road freight.
Put bluntly: Renewable diesel does not exist at any meaningful scale today, and it will not for a very long time.
Removing Fuel Tax Credits before alternatives are available would:
but it would operate like a carbon tax on essential freight.
Council was clear that this risks becoming a revenue measure rather than a transition measure, raising costs first and hoping solutions arrive later.
That is not how you decarbonise a system that underpins food security and national economies.
Productivity Is the Lever That Works Now
Importantly, this is not ALRTA resisting change.
The Government’s own Transport and Infrastructure Net Zero Roadmap identifies the most effective near-term emissions reductions for freight as coming from:
These reforms reduce emissions per tonne moved by cutting trips, fuel use and congestion, delivering permanent gains while cleaner fuels scale gradually.
This is the sensible sequencing: productivity first, fuels in parallel, taxation last - not the other way around.
ALRTA commends the Federal Department of Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sports and the Arts for recognising this reality. Senior officials in Minister Catherine King’s office clearly understand that productivity and access reform are the foundation of any credible freight transition.
The challenge now is ensuring this same operational understanding is reflected across the whole of government, particularly within Treasury and in how Productivity Commission recommendations are interpreted. Good fiscal policy must support transition rather than run ahead of it.
ALRTA raised these risks early with government and industry, and formally briefed the Australian Trucking Association last year on the dangers of premature FTC reform.
That work is now aligning nationally.
ATA CEO Mat Munro and Chair Mark Parry have both publicly called on the Government to reject the Productivity Commission’s recommendation to phase out Fuel Tax Credits.
That alignment matters. A united industry voice is essential to ensure emissions policy does not cause unintended damage to regional Australia.
Livestock and rural transport is an essential service. When freight costs spike suddenly, the impacts cascade through producers, processors, regional communities and ultimately consumers.
Members have already seen what happens when governments talk about “transition” without first ensuring viable alternatives are in place. The live sheep export phase-out showed that when change runs ahead of capability, funding can be diluted through consultants, administration and advertising, while the people most directly affected are left to absorb the impact.
ALRTA is determined that freight decarbonisation does not follow the same path.
For us, transition does not mean forcing change and hoping solutions follow. It means no structural change to costs or taxation until reliable, affordable alternatives actually exist on the ground.
That is why ALRTA’s position is clear:
We will continue working constructively with industry and government to ensure decarbonisation policy reflects operational reality, not assumptions or aspirational timelines.
This is not about delaying change.
It is about refusing to repeat the mistake of changing the rules before the system is ready.
Until next week, stay safe.